carry a very interesting post @ lice (Beyond the Mirror) which speaks of the false dialectic of opposites. The post takes up some themes of my article Mental cages that were similar issues. "@ lice over the Mirror " has a mailing list very interesting, it's called " conspiracy theorists." To subscribe send an email to : teorici-del-complotto@googlegroups.com ;
Even non-members can access and post messages. The ML can be seen at
http://groups.google.it/group/teorici-del-complotto
Even non-members can access and post messages. The ML can be seen at
http://groups.google.it/group/teorici-del-complotto
original article I aggointo some pictures.
the game of mirrors False Opposites
by @ lice (Beyond the Mirror)
7 Marzo 2011
 |
| Personaggi di "South Parck" |
Tempo fa vidi una puntata di " South Parck " (cartone animato satirico sulla società americana, e che, Despite the horrible bet on 'September 11, often from interesting ideas to think about and this cartoon was made for adults and is completely incomprehensible and inappropriate for children), which satirized on' impoortanza do every vote "taking as a starting point votanzione school where small players had to choose the mascot of their Sciola ... in a" sandwich Shit "and a" Giant Peretta . In summary, one of the small players are punished because he refuses to vote: do not understand how a vote can only be important when it comes to large numbers, and even fewer understand importance which has to vote between a shit sandwich and a giant Peretta : both suck as a school mascot. At the end of the episode the boy is made to understand that every choice or great vote of his life is made between a shit sandwich and a giant Peretta , and therefore it is better to resign at this early age, the child should be then to vote, but discovers that his vote was useless as one of the candidates has had a landslide victory ...
That cartoon made me thundering in mind the theme of "False Opposites " This is when we go to vote, in which every choice in which we "forced" to take sides between two seemingly opposing factions, but in reality identical mirror image.
It 's true: the choice, every our choice is always between a shit sandwich and a giant Peretta.
When we choose to vote in practice between two opposing sides that seem, ma che seguono (per i temi non marginali) la medesima agenda dettata alla fin fine dai Burattinai e dai loro intermediari :
l'Euro lo avremmo avuto anche con Berlusconi, e la partecipazione alle missioni in Afghanistan e Iraq le avremmo avute anche con Prodi (o con un qualsiasi altro esponente di " sinistra "); le differenze fra i due schieramenti sono alla fin fine cosmetiche, e la poca differenza sostanziale si ha essenzialmente su temi di rilevanza assai limitata (tenere o levare i crocifissi dalle aule scolastiche, dare più o meno galera a qualche ragazzino beccato con un paio di spinelli ecc), e spesso pure su quei temi i governi non potranno seguire i programmi propagandati in campagna elettorale poichè le leggi Europee si rivelano in contrasto (leggi fatte da un organo non eletto e pressochè sconosciuto agli Italiani, visto che il Parlamento Europeo è solo un organo Consultivo e NON Legislativo).
Quindi votare per uno o l'altro schieramento è come scegliere fra un Panino di Merda e una Peretta Gigante (con l'aggiunta del fatto che nessuna delle due candidate è chi realmente decide le sorti del nostro paese e del Mondo) .
Sino a non troppo tempo fa credevo ingenuamente che almeno vortare " per il meno peggio " avesse un senso (inoltre comprendere CHI possa essere il meno peggio è come " discutere sul sesso degli angeli "), ma ora comprendo quanto anche ciò sia vano: non esiste alcun vrero " meno peggio " poichè tanto chi ha le redini NON è il personaggio che votiamo, che comunque ci sta ingannando e NON manterrà nemmeno le promesse fatte in campagna elettorale (che assai spesso sono " promese manipolatorie ", come quando fecero credere alla sinistra che l'Europeismo fosse una via verso l'Eden della prosperità economica and stability).
But it is not going to vote that we are forced to take sides between false opposites.
young boy I attended for the "global justice movement " , even risking his neck at the G8 summit in Genoa in 2001.
I remember most of the kids who attended the Social Centre (Sinistra " antagonista ") avevano spesso scaramucce con i ragazzini che frequentavano i circoli di Forza Nuova (estrema destra) : si andava dallo strappare i manifesti altrui appesi per la città, fare graffiti offensivi sulle porte delle sedi del circolo altrui, fino a vere e proprie risse. Peccato che ci fossero in realtà molte somilianze psicologiche e perfino ideologiche fra i due opposti schieramenti (se un qualsiasi esponente dei CSOA o di Forza Nuova leggesse queste parole avrebbe un istantaneo travaso di bile)... e che entrambi gli schieramenti fossero pesantemente manipolati dall'alto (anche se ne i " quadri intermedi ", nor even the kids if they could realize: even I who took part in these quarrels I did not realize that the global justice movement of the social centers were manipulated, and I did not know even the adults who ran the Social Centre that I attended and coordination with other community centers: probably alone who was at the top or just below the summit of the global justice movement , of \u200b\u200bwhich the social centers were only one component, acted in premeditated and manipulative way carrying out actions and ideology rather than a global justice was PROGLOBALgovernance ).
Growing up, I slowly realized that virtually all ideologies are carried out "for complementary opposites (or rather False Opposites ) with a method that is linked the Hegelian dialectic :
 |
| Hegelian dialectic: the synthesis of thesis and antithesis |
from thesis and antithesis (used with the logic of "divide and rule " in Roman memory, which also serves to create a " compartmentalization of information" between the sides, which I will explain later in the text) we arrive at a synthesis, bringing together "the best of the two opposing ideologies in a syncretism so dear to the NWO (New World Order will be based on the ideological syncretism, religious, cultural value, in which the multiplicity would come to an indistinct mush and easily malleable traditions and beliefs spread on a global scale).
is used precisely the logic of "divide and rule "
are created (often Round Table) by crashing his ideologies , in which each side thinks " or you're with us or against us " . Often accession to either ideology (ideology and religious beliefs also mean, rooting for one or the other team sports, and generally any topic that there are opposing factions) factors is supported by more emotional than rational, and this creates lack of communication between the sides as well as mutual hatred.
We as humans have the ancestral memory to identify what we consider "our clan " as "good- us and strangers, or who does not share our ideas, customs etc. as "other- bad, just as both wolf packs, which groups of chimpanzees, the encounter between different clans often leads to bloody clashes. This biological feature was cleverly exploited by the Puppeteers, is to foment wars, is to divide in a multitude of opposing ideologies.
Some examples:
- In Schools For example, American kids are divided into groups identified by the following fashion, the music they hear, by popularity, by the fact that some sports practice or have good grades, etc., and these divisions create a structure similar to the small clan of people in uniform which Each clan has a precise place in the " social hierarchy" of the school, and it is virtually impossible for a kid who has been accepted by the "EMO " to even talk with a sports or engaged to a cheerleader ; between the groups exists a almost complete segregation and a mutual hatred.
- Have you ever tried to explain to a supporter of Berlusconi that he might actually (I would say sicuaramente) have committed reprehensible crimes (I do not mean much to bump girls against their will, but mafia crimes, support to carry out the massacres of the State in the Lead, etc.)? And have you ever tried to explain to a strong supporter of the Left (of those who do not lose an operation and Travaglio Santoro or a monologue by Saviano, for instance) that, despite the almost total certainty of guilt of Berlusconi, he is not the Because of all the ills of the country and still come out the timing with which the various processes is decidedly suspect ?
- you ever tried to be a Christian to see the unequivocal picture in which the Pope made the gesture of the Masonic Horns? (Up to explain that that this is a Masonic gesture and that they do most of the Western politicians and others, all ok .. but if you come to the Pope then the answer will be " is a case, the horns do not want to blame the photos! "Even when you see him maybe more than a picture with maybe more than a pope.).
- you ever tried to give a flyer on a militant Communist Bank Seigniorage? (Will tell you, without even reading beyond the title, which is a hoax Nazi ideals, communist or capitalist, or not so wrong ... then if you add that Communism was Mason who created you risk you take a fight ...)
- ... and because if I talk about New Age Luciferian (which is proven by reading the writings of "New Age Parents ") I was accused of being a Fundamentalist Christian (when I'm not even baptized), but when I speak of the dark side of the Catholic Church of yesterday and today I was accused of being New Age?
- .. and if I explain why an environmentalist that the history of "Global Warming from CO2 " is a bullshit, he accuses me of wanting to "destroy the environment "or even" Essert the pay of oil companies ?
- .. and why in " field plots " there is often a part of the skeptic who does not believe to the bitter end to 'existence, even hypothetical, it's no conspiracy of any reality outside of the official du, while on the other side many people seem to get lost in the sea of \u200b\u200btheories forgetting that every theory must have a minimum of convincing evidence before it is declared more than that a possibility?
 |
| |
- The same also applies to the cheering sports: people come to stepping on and destroying whole cities " support" their team, and often hatred for their opponents (ie, for those rooting for the other team) is so visceral to also lead to acts of unprecedented violence and stupidity (great way of Puppeteers to channel anger, frustration, social and primitive instincts " bread and circuses "+" divide and rule "when it would be much more logical that even fans of opposing teams did friendship for the common passion for a particular sport).
- because he who speaks of " flaws" of the " alternative energy" is always associated with the oil companies, and why if you talk about the problems of nuclear power have to side with the " alternative energy?
- ecc ecc....
Insomma, siamo ingabbiati in una miriade di Falsi Opposti, che servono sia a farci specare energie scontrandoci fra di noi e facendoci sfogare la rabbia repressa in inutili schermaglie (mentre se unissimo le forze per scontrarci contro chi REALMENTE crea i problemi e ci comanda...diverremmo una forza inarrestabile e perciò assai pericolosa per i Burattinai), sia a compartimentalizzate le informazioni in modo che le persone non si accorgano di chi realmente tira le fila:
on the political front against the voters do not realize that politics is a game of mirrors in which they labor Emilio Fede I never will tell us the whole truth, and in which the Premier is just a puppet that serves to channel the 'attention, hopes and anger of the people away from those who really decide for the country, for Europe and the World;
more generally the creation of opposing ideologies prevented from forming a true idea the history of this, environmental issues etc etc, in short creates a " compartmentalization of information" very useful ai Burattinai per portare avanti i loro piani in un mondo dove mantenere segreta un informazione è sempre più difficile.
Per questo motivo i movimenti " anti NWO " sono fra i più colpiti dalla creazione di Falsi Opposti: si creano una miriade di teoprie in contrasto (o spesso di teorie PARZIALI) sostenute da vari " guru ", e si fa in modo che:
- ad es quasi solo siti Cristiani Fondamentalisti parlino della New Age Luciferina, e che quasi solo siti New Age talk of deceptions and abominations of Christianity (part: the New Agers usually prefer to get lost on side issues like the controversy on the historicity of the insoluble Cristoo on dogmas " no longer applicable to our time " rather than analysis and data ports on the misdeeds Vatican , and clearly avoid naming the Jesuits for obvious reasons);
- almost only who is right (often extreme) I am talking about the problem of seigniorage or immigration
- in the world and you keep separate from the sites of those who make political activism by those who fight the NWO etc.;
. . tuttro displacing and dress the myriad of misinformation and sites (for sites I also want to blog, ML, Forum, etc.) that continue to " to separate the arguments and ideas " aggressively attacking anyone who tries to explain that not only can Christians Luciferian New Age talk about not only who is right and so can speak of seigniorage.
Un'altro metodo è l'associare nella mente delle persone certi temi a " personaggi o concetti abietti ":
per questo la maggior parte di persone pensa che solo i Neonazisti parlino di Revisionismo sull' Olocausto (anzi NEGAZIONISMO, il concetto di Revisionismo viene infatti confuso dai più con il negazionismo totale), quando invece esistono studiosi Revisionisti che hanno ORIGINI EBRAICHE e sono persino stati inprigionati in campi di concentramento nazisti!
E anche per questo motivo sembra che solo un fanatico Cristiano ready to create stakes talks about New Age Luciferian or Lucifer and UN .
For the same reason, the seigniorage associated with groups such as neo-fascist Forza Nuova frankly, while I can only speak of plots crazy paranoid ...
To make people believe this may be acting primarily in three ways:
- make really almost only such "fanatics Christians "speak ill of New age or that most of the information you find on sites that array or carried out by the kind of authors (for example, this can be done by indoctrinating Christian groups and creating such fake sites on the net).
- ensure that only or almost only the authors' Christian fanatics "are" in view "when they speak evil of the New Age (eg giving priority to their sites on search engines, promoting their books but not for non-religious people that address the same subject);
- fare in modo che le persone CREDANO che solo " fanatici cristiani " parlano male della New Age, in casi in cui invece ci siano informazioni che provengono sia da loro sia da altri (per ottenere ciò basta che persone considerate " opinion leader ", ad esempio esperti in televisione, dicano che " solo i fanatici cristiani parlano male della New Age ", è il caso del mito secondo il quale solo Nazisti parlano di Revisionismo sull' Olocausto).
Far associare alle persone un concetto con personaggi fanatici, malevoli o pazzi è un ottimo modo per prevent people deepen the arguments on these issues: nobody wants to be considered crazy, fanatical or evil by others (this strategy is called "Name Calling ", and is much used by debunkers online or on television as it is a typical " strategy stops thinking ")...
The " Name Calling", along with other " bloccapensiero strategies, and False Opposites in the division, the manufacture of consent and dissent false, are the main means of manipulation of thought used by the Puppeteers to keep us in cages Mental , and unfortunately, the results seem very high if you look at the reality in which we live.
you ever tried to put a cat in front of the mirror he did not recognize his own image and attack with fury.
and if we stand for one or the other, we do Puppet play .... attacking us with fury among us, like a cat with its mirror image.
original article link: http://aliceoltrelospecchio.blogspot.com/2011 / 03/il-gioco-di-specchi-dei-falsi-opposti.html
0 comments:
Post a Comment