Sunday, March 6, 2011

Hydrocodone To Lower Blood Pressure

faziosissime Two reflections on the reform of the judiciary

Al Tg2 have just told by a doctor who abused his patient. It 'a regrettable episode and ugly, disgraceful and shameful conduct.
Epper ...
many cases we read in the last five or ten years, doctors who have abused patients, provided analysis unnecessary to tap their money, medicines prescribed only to have economic bonus for themselves, fought with the staff in the operating room, forgotten scalpels and other tools of the trade in the bowels of the patients in the operating room? So, let's say that a minister, no matter which side, decided to remedy this - putacaso - to privatize hospitals. No one denies that we had too many medical malpractice in Italy, there are many aspects to improve or change too deeply, that there are enormous waste of resources. But perhaps that doctors, with the new health facility, never forget the knife in the belly or not they abuse more of their patients? I did
this thought as I watched the service of Tg2, because these days The Journal has launched a new campaign against the judiciary , collecting cases, also quite striking and surprising, that the magistrates had carried out, as I say, objectionable. As for me, may continue for days, weeks, months, years, but I'm not convinced that a judiciary with separate careers or a High Court instead of the CSM can to stop such conduct. For the same reason that a health organized differently will not prevent dishonest or incompetent doctors to continue to do damage.


Speaking of justice, I read on Republic of the reform agenda of the minister Alfano. One of the main characteristic is the civil liability of magistrates. Liana Milella, generally very well informed on these matters, presented the case pm of which are "well your wallet to compensate the defendant, who intercepted without success." I wondered how to react if the company I work for me to repay the travel expenses incurred by me only if the contract is signed by the customer. Go up by car only if I had the certainty of the signature, or if the game worth the candle (for example, to reach the place was ten miles from my office or to sign the contract was so high that the risk also make a longer journey), and for the rest, wait calmly at his desk (ever said that even then the cost of telephone ...). In other words, I would be inefficient and the company, rather than save money, we would call a lot of money. I will say that the work of the magistrate is not an official commercial. Very true. But even a judge before being that a human being. And, equally, I fear that the requirement to pay directly to the prosecutor of his own pocket in danger of turning into a provision that will make the investigation effective only against the chicken thieves caught red-handed.

0 comments:

Post a Comment